Pennsylvania Underwriting Concerns and Guidelines
In addition to supplementing Chapter 54 of the
Pennsylvania text these guidelines shall serve as a supplement to the
endorsement text entitled Instructions as to the Use of Title
Insurance Endorsements (hereinafter sometimes referred to [as the
Endorsement text]). The guidelines included herewith are not
all-inclusive. If you have questions regarding form, fee or underwriting
standards for any requested endorsements we suggest you contact your
title insurance underwriter. Underwriting Guidelines may also be
obtained on the World Wide Web from:
1.
the following websites:
·
First
American Title Insurance Company located at www.firstam.com
;
·
Stewart
Title Guaranty Company located at www.stg.com
and go to the Virtual Underwriter [VU] link;
·
Title Law Associates™ located at www.titlelawannotated®.com/endors.html
and go to both the Endorsements and the Forms links; The Endorsement
Link contains a detailed analysis entitled “Managing
Risk through the Use of Endorsements”; and
2.
The following texts:
·
Gosdin,
Title Insurance, A Comprehensive Overview, Exhibit 6, Common
Endorsements in Commercial Transaction, and
·
Hart,
Instructions as to the Use of Title Insurance Endorsements, a
copy of which may be found on this CD-Rom.
·
Hart,
The Law of Titles in Pennsylvania, Chapter 54 page 1, Policy
and Endorsement Guidelines.
THE ADOPTION OF THE MARCH 1995 TIRBOP MANUAL
Title insurance rates, charges and available coverage
governed in Pennsylvania by the Manual of the Title Insurance Rating
Bureau of Pennsylvania [TIRBOP],
which became effective March 1, 1995. Subsequent revisions have since
been approved, the latest revision as of the date of this supplement
being March 1, 2000.
RATE RULE 2.7
Section 2.7 state in part:
“No form of policy, endorsement or other coverage may be issued which
varies
the terms, conditions, stipulations or exclusions of
a Policy unless first approved
by the Department (of Insurance).”
This section specifically
prohibits any form of coverage which changes the policy boilerplate.
What this means, inter alia, is that in Pennsylvania you cannot remove
the preprinted creditors’ rights exclusion from the policy by
endorsement in the same way the you can, for example, in New York by
issuing the TIRSA Standard New
York Endorsement. The Department of Insurance made an exception to
the rule when they approved the filing of the TIRBOP Pa Forms series
700, and the individual endorsements forms 400, 1040, 1041, 1050, 1060,
1090 and 1100 endorsements.
Some underwriters believe a strict reading of
section 2.7 alone indicates that no endorsement coverage may be given
other than those endorsements set forth in the Rate Manual, as amended
from time to time. However, section 2.4 gives the title insurer coverage
options provided they do not embellish upon or circumvent endorsements
already approved for use as filed forms. Section 2.4 states:
“Nothing herein shall prohibit the insurer from charging an additional
special fee
for affirmative risk coverage(s) not
contained in the endorsements set forth
in this manual (emphasis mine).
Title Coverage Rule
We interpret this to mean that while you can’t
modify the coverage provided in any existing and approved filed
endorsement form; you can provide other forms of affirmative coverage
not otherwise expressly prohibited. The key to the underwriting analysis
is to accurately determine that any affirmative coverage provided by
special endorsement neither:
·
modifies
coverage already provided for in the existing filed endorsement forms;
nor
·
undertakes
to provide coverage subject to regulatory prohibition and sanction.
Thus, the underwriter must thoroughly review any form
of requested coverage. The underwriter must also read Rate Rules 2.7 and
6.23 together. Rate Rule 6.23 deals with the use of the TIRBOP PA 1070 GENERAL ENDORSEMENT more particularly addressed
below. In addition, any form of
coverage, which alters the approved policy and endorsement forms, must
be filed as a deviation from the TIRBOP filing and further approved by
the Department of Insurance.
THREE CRITICAL STAGES OF TITLE INSURANCE AS THEY ARE RELATED TO
ENDORSEMENT COVERAGE
From a lenders perspective there are three
critical phases to the title insurance underwriting process:
·
The
loan documentation phase;
·
The
modification or workout phase; and
·
The
litigation or policy claim phase.
When negotiating for coverage counsel should keep all
of these in mind. In this instance we are primarily concerned with the
loan documentation phase. However, we would note that in phase two the
lender and its counsel would be concerned with:
·
Whether
there was a “pre-negotiation” agreement in existence relating
to
the avoidance of the “Creditors’ Rights” exclusion via issuing the
1970
(rev. 10/17/84) ALTA Loan Policy in lieu of the 1992 Loan Policy;
·
Whether
that policy was in fact issued; and
·
Whether
a TIRBOP 500 [ALTA 11] or CLTA
Form 110.5
Mortgage
modification endorsement may be obtained.
In phase three, the litigation or policy claim phase,
the lender and its counsel may be looking for, inter alia, ambiguities
in the policy or, other matters allowing for a claim under the general
rules of insurance construction; since, the traditional rules governing
the interpretation of insurance policies are applied to the construction
of title policies [cases cited PLI pub. No. 144 at page 258; Palomar, The
Law of Titles, §103 [2], citing cases].
Returning to the loan documentation phase, counsel
for the insured is principally concerned with the selection of
appropriate coverage. There are really two primary concerns:
·
Determining
whether the proper endorsements were requested; and
·
Proper
recognition of the risks
which are covered by the title
insurance
policy
and recognition of those, which are not covered by, title insurance.
NB for a more detailed
review of these concerns the reader is referred to the TLA
Website
located at www.titlelawannotated®.com/endors.html There we have more
particularly
Identified examples of these concerns. They include:
·
Risks
not covered by title insurance;
·
Covered
risks including matters of an
exclusionary or interpretive nature for which endorsements may be
obtained;
·
Examples
of endorsements designed to address the 5 preprinted general policy exceptions;
·
Examples
of endorsements designed to address special
exceptions; and
·
Examples
of special endorsements designed to address loan
documentation and loan policies.
Naturally, this supplement is more narrow in scope
because of the limitations and regulatory prohibitions imposed with the
adoption of the TIRBOP Manual, as thereafter amended and revised.
However, we have attempted to follow that format.
TIRBOP PA 100 SERIES ENDORSEMENTS RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS
The PA 100
Series endorsements are a good example of special exception endorsements. An important function of
endorsements is to address coverage issues not otherwise contemplated by
the policy resulting from specific factual situations disclosed by an
examination of the public record resulting in the inclusion of Schedule
B “special exceptions”.
The 100 series endorsements address restrictions of
record. In the event the examination of title discloses restrictive
covenants of record imposing conditions on the use or development of the
property, counsel for the insured may require assurance that same will
not result in a forfeiture or reversion of title, loss of the property
improvements, or otherwise affect the validity, priority or
enforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage. If the examination
of title does not disclose any restrictions of record and none are shown
in the commitment or policy, there is no reason to provide or charge for
any of these endorsements. However, as a practical matter, if a lender,
out of habit or misunderstanding, requires a TIRBOP
PA 100 Endorsement to be issued with the policy we do not believe
there is any additional exposure created by complying with such a
request. The most recent version of the 100 form contains language that
specifies that the endorsement does not include coverage for any restrictions contained in a lease or
relating to matters of environmental protection.
NB
A common provision of the 100 series of endorsements is the assurance
provided regarding reverter; i.e., the assurance that the document
creating or imposing the restriction(s) does not also provide that, in
the event of a violation of the restriction, title will revert back and
thereafter become vested in either the creator of the restrictive
covenant or someone other than the current record title holder. If the
restrictive covenants under examination do impose or imply a reversion
of any kind, none of the 100 endorsement series may be issued without
written underwriter approval. The provision of any form of affirmative
coverage, such as that customarily used in other states is likely to be
in violation of TIRBOP Rate Rules
2.7 and 6.23.
·
The
TIRBOP 100 Endorsement
insures the insured that any restrictions disclosed by an examination of
title are not violated, up to the date of the policy, by existing
improvements. Take note that there is no further statement of coverage
regarding future events, such as is customary in other regions of the
country (e.g. and that future violation will not cause a forfeiture or reversion of
title). The charge is $50.00, and it is issued only to a lender. The
restriction of record must be examined and the nature and use of
existing improvements established to determine if any violations
currently exist. There is some question, from the apparent implication
of the endorsement language, as to whether any past violation should be
duly noted. However, as a general rule, it is not necessary to determine
if there had ever previously been on the premises a violation of the
restriction(s), so long as there is no current violation. If the
restrictions are in fact being violated, then TIRBOP
Endorsement 101 is more appropriate.
·
The
TIRBOP Endorsement 101 [existing
improvements] specifies that there is an existing violation of the
restrictions of record as of the date of the policy, defines the nature
of the violation and insures the insured against loss or damage the
insured may sustain in the event a court of competent jurisdiction
determines that the existing improvements must be removed on account of
the violation. The restrictions and improvements must be evaluated as to
potential risk; other factors to consider include the parties entitled
to enforce the restrictions; the nature of the surrounding neighborhood
(including similar violations); the extent and length of time of the
existing violation(s), and whether there has been an abandonment of the
neighborhood scheme. This endorsement usually requires underwriter
approval. The charge is 10% of the applicable rate with a minimum charge
of $75.00.00. The endorsement may be issued to an owner, lender or
lessee.
·
The
TIRBOP Endorsement 102
specifies the proposed future improvements, as shown and defined on
detailed plans or drawings, or future specified use, will not violate
existing restrictions. The underwriting review is substantially the same
as that for the 100, with the
added requirement of a review of and reference to a plan or drawing that
adequately locates and defines the future improvements and their
location. The charge is 10% of the applicable rate with a minimum charge
of $75.00.00. The endorsement may be issued to an owner, lender or
lessee.
·
The
TIRBOP Endorsement 103 [new
construction] specifies that the proposed future improvements as shown
and defined on detailed plans, do in fact violate restrictions of
record, defines the nature of the violation and insures the insured
against loss if the proposed improvements must be removed on account of
the violation of the restrictive covenant. The underwriting issues are
similar to those considered for endorsement 101.
However, because new improvements present a greater risk than existing
improvements the risk premium is higher. See the TIRBOP Manual for
charges. Issuance of this endorsement requires underwriter approval.
·
The
TIRBOP Endorsement 104
provides the same coverage to an owner/lessee that the endorsement 100 provides to a lender and the underwriting review and guidelines
are the same. However, the charge for this coverage is 10% of the
applicable rate with a minimum charge of $75.00.00.
NB
The only other TIRBOP form
that addresses, inter alia, special
exception matters is the TIRBOP
PA ENDORSEMENT 1030.
THE TIRBOP 300
SERIES OF ENDORSption that appears as an exception on Schedule B-2 of the Commitment
to Insure. There are two PA 300 series endorsement forms:
·
The
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 300 for
the lender; and
·
The
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 301 for
the owner/lessee.
As a general title
rule, all commitments and policies should contain the survey
exception. However, upon the issuance of either endorsement form the
survey exception becomes limited in nature. These endorsements provide
affirmative coverage to the insured, without exception, for matters
discoverable by survey, such as unrecorded easements and survey
discrepancies; and further insure against loss by reason of any
encroachments. However, should you have actual knowledge of an
encroachment the coverage is not to be provided without underwriter
approval because 300 the endorsement insures against loss
or damage without qualification, definition or limitation. By way of
clarification, these endorsements do not remove or affirmatively insure
over any conditions actually disclosed by plans or surveys, either prior
or current, such as evidence of an easement or encroachment. If, for
example, the survey prepared & produced prerequisite to the issuance
of endorsement 301 shows
conditions affecting title, such conditions should be separately
excepted on Schedule B of the owner’s policy. Usually 301
owner’s coverage is requested after closing and it is then that the
survey is required. However, If a survey produced prior to closing
discloses setback conditions, easements, encroachments or overlaps, such
conditions belong to be excepted in both the owner’s and loan
policy.
·
Take
note that the recommended additional exception stating “Content Area
Not Insured” is not removed or addressed by either endorsement.
Bear in mind that when an out of state lender or
purchaser requests a so-called “survey endorsement”, they may not be
expecting or anticipating any form of 300
series endorsement coverage. Instead, they may have in mind and be
expecting a “Land Same as Survey” [CLTA Form 116.1] endorsement
form. Before you may issue this endorsement it should first be filed as
a deviation with the Department of Insurance. Once that is approved, the
examiner must compare the description of the land being insured with the
referenced survey. If necessary, the description must be redrawn in
accordance with the referenced survey. As a Practice
Suggestion we recommend the redrawn description follow the record
description, preceded by the words “.
. .the above land being more particularly described in accordance with a
survey prepared by ____________ , PE & LS, dated ____________ , as
follows”. Thereafter enter the redrawn description.
Issuance of the CLTA
Form 116.1 endorsement requires underwriter approval. The charge for
this form of coverage will most likely vary from one underwriter to
another.
NB A
brief word here about TIRBOP PA
ENDORSEMENT 1030. While that is addressed elsewhere in this chapter
supplement, that endorsement form provides multiple forms of coverage to
a lender, including matters included within the Pennsylvania survey
exception. Endorsement 1030
coverage requires the production and review of a current ALTA/ACSM
survey.
THE TIRBOP 400
RELATING TO MANUFACTURED HOUSING
This endorsement protects mobile homes or moveable
housing units by modifying the policy definition of land so that the
manufactured housing may be included and insured as real property under
the terms of the policy. In determining whether the endorsement coverage
may be given the following requirement should be satisfied:
·
The
ownership of both the trailer and the land must be in the same party;
·
The
trailer must be affixed to the land in the following manner:
·
The
axles and wheels must be removed;
·
The
trailer must be fixed upon a permanent foundation;
·
There
must be a permanent connection to a septic tank or sewer
system and to
power facilities.
Production of affidavit(s), photographs, information
from reliable sources or a physical inspection of the premises may
satisfy these requirements. You should also obtain a copy of the Bill of
Sale and Certificate of Title or Certificate of registration if the
mobile home was ever subject to registration under the motor vehicle
laws. Any security interest, lien or encumbrance noted thereon should be
shown as an exception in the policy to issue unless proof is produced
that it has been satisfied. Additionally, a UCC filing search should be
made and any financing statements revealed by the search are to be shown
as exceptions in the policy to issue unless satisfactory proof is
furnished that same have been released or expired by time.
The charge for the coverage is $50.00.
THE TIRBOP 800
SERIES RELATING TO CONDOMINIUMS AND PUDS
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 810
[ALTA Form 4.1] contains 7 affirmative statements and affords multiple
forms of coverage with respect to the condominium regime and
documentation. A detailed analysis and underwriting guidelines may be
found in the endorsement text located on this CD-Rom. However, because
of the Pennsylvania Rate Rules mentioned herein, the endorsement may not
be modified or amended in the manner suggested in the endorsement text.
Furthermore, the reader should note that these underwriting guidelines
are frequently overlooked. It is incumbent upon the examiner and agent
to follow these guidelines. Failure to do so may result in partial or
total failure of title and the loss incurred thereunder. Particularly
where it may later be determined that coverage in the aggregate (i.e.,
insurance of the construction loan followed by insurance of most of the
out sales) exceeds a particular title insurers self-imposed single risk
limitation or treaty reinsurance agreement. The charge for this
endorsement is $50.00.
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 820
[ALTA Form 5.1] affords multiple forms of coverage with respect to the
PUD Regime and Documentation, when affixed to a policy in which the
insured land is a PUD. The same suggestions and references as apply to
the TIRBOP 810 above should be followed here. The charge for the
endorsement is $50.00.
THE TIRBOP
ENDORSEMENTS RELATING TO LOAN POLICIES AND LOAN DOCUMENTATION
·
The
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 500 [based
on ALTA Form 11] is designed for use where the issuing office or agent
is asked to insure a Modification
Agreement to a previously insured mortgage. In many cases insurance
of mortgage modifications represents an extra-hazardous risk [see Brodkey/Colavito, Title
Insurance Considerations in Dealing with the Troubled Loan, NYLJ;
Giesen, “Routine” Mortgage
Modification: Lenders Beware, Real Estate Law Journal, Winter, 1989;
Hart, Debt Restructuring Problems in the Workout of Troubled Real Estate
Assets, The Land Title Institute of Virginia CLE Seminar, 1991;
Hart, The Law of Titles in Pennsylvania, Chapter 33, Mortgages and Mortgage Modifications, December 1994 Supplement.;
Panzer, The Effect of Mortgage
Modifications and Consolidations on Lien Priority, PLTA Annual
Convention Address 1977; Western Pa. National Bank v Peoples, 439
Pa. 304;
The
Title Risk, in a nutshell, may be summarized as follows. Matters
occurring after the original effective date of the policy may impact
upon the Title Company’s ability to insure the continued priority of
the lien of the mortgage after the modification. While it is proper for
a borrower and a lender to later agree upon an extension of maturity or
the alteration of the terms of the original mortgage, such changes are
not binding upon non-consenting third party junior creditors who may be
prejudiced thereby. There may be “impairment of priority” problems
that must be addressed under state law. Changes that may present
priority problems would include new provisions that:
·
unpaid
interest may be capitalized;
·
new
money may be advanced;
·
the
interest rate may change;
·
contingent
interest may be added; or
·
additional
collateral may be added as security.
Thus, any action which the lender takes to change its
relationship with the borrower which imposes additional obligations
upon, or impair the borrowers ability to perform, under its obligations
to junior creditors, may result in a judicial determination that, the
junior creditors rights have been prejudiced to such an extent that, the
lien of the mortgage should be partially or totally equitably
subordinated to the liens of junior creditors.
This is a high-risk endorsement. In addition to requiring a
search of the public records from the date of the mortgage, in order to
determine if there are any intervening matters or creditors, it shall
also be necessary to determine whether the modification so changes the
terms of the original mortgage, as to constitute a novation. Because of
the extra-hazardous risk nature of the coverage, the charges vary and
are set forth more fully in the Rate Manual.
See also ATIC Underwriting Bulletin 88-16 Mortgage
Modification Agreements.
·
The
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 600
modifies certain policy terms to conform to the requirements of the
Federal Home Loan Bank. The only requirement is that the lender or
assignee be the Federal Home Loan Bank.
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 700 series.
Both these endorsements provide the lender with additional assurances as
to the priority of mortgage documents that provide for changes in the
rate of interest. These are the Pennsylvania equivalents of the ALTA Variable Rate Mortgage Endorsement Forms [ALTA Forms 6 and 6.2].
These endorsements protect lenders whose loan interest rates are based
on something other than that of a fixed-rate, level payment,
self-liquidating loan and provide further assurance of the continued
priority of the lien of the mortgage whose interest rate may, by its
terms, from time to time be renegotiated. The endorsements provide
coverage otherwise precluded under a loan policy (by reason of
difficulties arising due to loan provisions such as negative
amortization, compound interest, accruals and fluctuating interest), in
that they insure the lender against loss or damage sustained by reason
(of a subsequent determination) of the invalidity or unenforceability of
the lien of the mortgage resulting from:
·
Changes
in the interest rate provided for;
·
Charging
interest upon interest; or
·
The
addition of unpaid interest from the principal balance.
This
may prove to be a high-risk endorsement if requested together with other
commercial endorsements common to equity
participation loans. The mortgage document must be examined to
determine that it includes and provides notice to the borrower of the
changing or renegotiable interest rate. A more detailed review of the
underwriting concerns regarding this issue as it relates to equity
participation loan issues may be found in Hart, Instructions as
to the Use of Title Insurance Endorsements, a copy of which is
included with this CD-Rom.
·
Endorsement
710 [ALTA
Form 6] applies to variable rate loans;
·
Endorsement
710(6.2)
[ALTA Form 6.2] applies to variable rate loan interest rate changes that
include provisions for negative amortization.
The charge for each endorsement is $50.00.
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 900
[ALTA Form 8.1] insures the lien priority of the insured mortgage over
environmental protection liens except those designated by the
Pennsylvania Statute(s) as specifically set forth in the endorsement
itself. In Pennsylvania the statutory reference to be included as
exceptions on the form include The Land Water Conservation and Reclamation Act, 32 P.S.§5101 et
seq.; and The PA Environmental
Legislation Hazardous Clean Up Act, Act 108 of 1988.
The
endorsement amends both the 1970 ALTA loan policy exclusions from
coverage [Ex cl. 1(b) and 1(d)] and the 1992 ALTA loan policy exclusions
from coverage [Ex. Cl. 1(a)(iv)]. NB
that where the 1992 loan policy form is to be issued the endorsement
should not be issued in the event the search and examination of the
property discloses an environmental protection lien filed of record in
either the county or relevant U.S. District Court jurisdiction. Because
of a change in the policy language between the two forms, if an
environmental protection lien is filed of record in either location, it
must be shown as an exception to title notwithstanding the fact that
environmental matters are specifically excluded from coverage under the
standard policy.
Title Rule: where the 1992-policy form is to be issued, if an environmental
protection lien is filed of record in either location, it must be shown
as an exception to title.
NB
the endorsement should only be issued to a lender making a loan on
residential property. However, the term “residential”
is not limited or defined in this context as being applicable only to
dwellings for one to four family use, as it is elsewhere in the ALTA
forms. Therefore, it may be issued in commercial transactions where an
apartment building qualifies as residential property.
The
charge for the coverage is a flat rate of $25.00.
See also ATIC Underwriting Bulletin 88-20.
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 1000
[Mandatory Advance Endorsement] provides the lender with assurances as
to the lien priority of advances made subsequent to the date of policy,
if the entire amount is not funded or disbursed at the time of
settlement or closing. The Mortgage, Note and Security Loan Agreement
documents must be examined to determine that such future advances are in
fact mandatory; i.e., that the lender has no choice or discretion about
making such advances. The charge for the coverage is a flat rate of
$25.00.
See also ATIC Underwriting Bulletin 89-15 Revolving
Credit Mortgage Considerations in Pennsylvania; and 91-25 Pennsylvania
Future Advance Loans; citing In Re Curtis Johnson: Provident
National Bank v First Pennsylvania Bank, Bankruptcy No. 90-11008S, (E.D.
Pa., March 11, 1991) citing 138 ALR 566, Optional
Advances under Mortgage as subject to Lien Intervening Between Giving of
the Mortgage and Making the Advance
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 1010
provides assurances as to the lien priority of future advances made
pursuant to a Revolving Line of Credit or Open End Mortgage. As with the
1000 Endorsement, the Mortgage, Note and Security Loan Agreement
documents must be examined to determine that such future advances are in
fact obligatory. Further, the Mortgage document must by its own terms
identify itself as being an “Open End Mortgage” pursuant to “Act
126 of 1990, 42 Pa C.S.A., §8143”. If the document does not so
identify itself prominently on the top of the form it may be denied
statutory priority protection.
The
charge for this coverage is different for residential and commercial
property. On a 1 to 4 family residential property the charge is a flat
fee of $50.00. The charge for this coverage on property other than a 1
t0 4 family residential structure is 10% of the applicable basic or
reissue rate.
See also ATIC Underwriting Bulletin 90-24, Act
No. 126; Bernstein, Pennsylvania’s
New Priority of Lien Law, Blank Rome Comisky & McCauley Financial
Services Update, Fall, 1990; Montgomery, McCracken, Walker &
Rhoads Banking Advisory,
November 1990.
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 1015 is
a variation of the Open End Mortgage Endorsement
1010 tailored to a mortgage securing periodic advances for new
construction. This endorsement provides limited insurance for
construction loan advances made pursuant to a mortgage that qualifies as
an “Open End Mortgage” by statute. By statute, the advances paid to
the borrower must be applied toward all of part of the costs of
completing any erection, construction, alteration or repair of the
mortgaged premises. The endorsement insures the lien priority of such
advances. The charge for the coverage is 10% of the applicable basic or
reissue rate with a minimum charge of $50.00.
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 1020 [FNMA Balloon Mortgage Endorsement] was
designed in response to the FNMA Balloon Mortgage Purchase program first
introduced in March of 1990. Mortgages originated under the program give
the borrower a conditional right to refinance at the end of the 7-year
term of the loan. Thereafter, if certain specified conditions were met,
the borrower had the option to both modify the existing mortgage and
execute and new note or, pay off the old loan and execute a new note and
mortgage. The endorsement insures a lender against the invalidity,
unenforceability or loss of priority of the insured mortgage resulting
from provisions which provide for a conditional right to refinance at a
later date at a changed interest rate. Detailed underwriting
instructions may be found in the endorsement text.
·
The
1030 Endorsement series (Revised 1999) [ALTA Form 9, Special Risks R.E.M.
Endorsement (a/k/a/ the PA Lender Comprehensive)] provide the lender
with multiple forms of affirmative coverage including, inter alia, those
provided under the Pa 100 and 300
series Endorsements, and the underwriting considerations are
similar. The endorsements also provide coverage against damage to the
surface from mineral extraction and so should satisfy and make less
burdensome the concern of lenders when the statutory coal clause and
title exception appears in the policy.
NB As
a title practice suggestion,
Endorsements 100 and 300 should not be issued when either 1030 form is attached to the policy unless they are specifically
requested by the insured and then only with underwriter approval. We
make this suggestion in order to avoid a subsequent determination by a
court, in the litigation or policy coverage claim phase, that there
exists a latent ambiguity between the 100 and 300 forms of coverage and
those provided for under the 1030 Endorsement form. You may recall we
mentioned these phases at the very beginning of this supplement. Since
title insurance policies are subject to and governed by the same general
rules and principles of construction which apply to other insurance
contracts, ambiguities in policy terms will be construed against the
insurer and in favor of the insured in the policy claim or litigation
phase.
It
may be significant to mention here that critics of the title insurance
industry’s effort to raise premium rates contend the rise in claims
over the past two decades stems more from poor underwriting and badly
written policies rather than changing circumstances within society. They
further contend that much of the litigation arises from ambiguously
worded policies; that a lot of title agents don’t understand the
policies they’re writing; and that a lot of sophisticated companies
offer broad coverage at unrealistically low prices.
·
TIRBOP
PA ENDORSEMENT 1031 (1999) [(ALTA Endorsement 9.1); (Restrictions, etc.
Unimproved land)]
·
TIRBOP
PA ENDORSEMENT 1032 (1999) [(ALTA Endorsement 9.2); (Restrictions, etc.,
Improved Land)];
Detailed
Underwriting Guidelines prerequisite to the issuance of the TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 1030 Forms [ALTA Forms 9.1 and 9.2 REM
Endorsement] may be found in the original Chapter 54 beginning at page
15 and the endorsement text. An ALTA/ASCM survey is required before
these multiple forms of coverage may be provided.
The
charge for this coverage is 10% of the applicable rate with a minimum
charge of $75.00.
·
The
TIRBOP PA Endorsement 1080 [Abbreviated
Form a/k/a the PA Residential Mortgagee Endorsement] incorporates by
reference 9 of the most common loan policy endorsements used in
Pennsylvania, and contained in the Rate Manual, onto one page. Each of
the referenced endorsements, as requested by the lender, can be checked
off in the appropriate block. The charge for each endorsement so checked
must be made in accordance with the Rate Manual.
·
THE TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 1100 [WAIVER OF ARBITRATION]
This endorsement amends the 1992 ALTA Loan
Policy by deleting Paragraph 13 of the Conditions and Stipulations
relating to arbitration. The coverage is only issued to a lender. The
charge for the endorsement is a flat fee of $100.00.
·
THE
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 1110 [“FIRST LOSS” ENDORSEMENT]
This
endorsement requires underwriter approval and provides, under certain
conditions, that the amount, which the insurer shall be liable to pay
under the policy, shall be determined without first requiring maturity
of the indebtedness by acceleration or otherwise. A more detailed
explanation of the coverage and the underwriting guidelines prerequisite
thereto may be found on either the Stewart Title Guaranty Company
website located at www.stewart.com
or the First American website located at www.firstam.com . The charge for this endorsement shall be
10% of the basic or reissue rate with a minimum of $500.00
·
THE
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 1120 [“APPLICATION OF MORTGAGE PAYMENTS” or
“LAST DOLLAR” ENDORSEMENT]
In many instances a
loan made by a lender will have as security both real and personal
property. The mortgage will likely be for an amount equal to the full
amount of the loan and perhaps be subject to or include the conditions
of a security agreement. The ALTA loan policy will be written for the
value of the real property used as security and the amount of the
insurance may be less than the amount shown on the face of the mortgage.
The last dollar endorsement provides that if the insured lender applies
all payments made by the mortgagees to the release of security other
than the land insured under the policy [as described on Sch. A], such
as, e.g., the personalty, until such time as the aggregate principal
indebtedness is reduced to the amount of the policy, coverage under the
policy will not be reduced by such application of payments. This
coverage provides the insured with coverage that the portion of the loan
secured by the real property would be the last to be paid off and permit
the title insurance to remain in effect until the full loan has been
paid off. The charge for this endorsement shall be 10% of the basic or
reissue rate with a minimum of $500.00.
THE TIRBOP ENDORSEMENTS RELATING TO MATTERS OF AN EXCLUSIONARY OR INTERPRETIVE NATURE FOR WHICH
ENDORSEMENTS MAY BE OBTAINED
A.
Environmental laws
are specifically excluded from coverage under the policy. Counsel for
the lender may not wish to be exposed to the “super lien” statutes,
resulting in a request for the TIRBOP PA Endorsement 900 [ALTA
Form 8.1].
B.
The continuation of business entities
following a substitution of interests
and the impact of that change upon continued policy coverage is
frequently the concern of counsel. Under the Uniform Partnership Act and
most state LLC statutes, the partnership or the LLC will dissolve when
only one member remains or when any member dies, withdraws or becomes
bankrupt, insolvent or incompetent. However, the Revised Uniform
Partnership Act, and most state LLC statutes, provide that the
partnership agreement or the LLC operating agreement may nonetheless
specifically provided within it’s terms for continuation of the
business of the partnership or the LLC and permit all or a majority of
the remaining partners or members to authorize continuation of the
business. Under the “Fairway”
rule, if less than the statutorily or contractually required number of
partners or members decides to reconstitute or continue the business of
the partnership or the LLC, coverage under the owner’s policy may be
terminated [see Fairway Development Co. v Title Ins. Co. of Minn., 621 F.
Supp. 120 (N.D. Ohio 1985). To avoid the conclusions reached in the Fairway
case special commercial endorsements were designed for Partnerships
and Limited Liability Companies regarding the questions of substitution
of interests. These special
endorsements are referred to as Fairway Endorsements.
·
The
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 1040 was
designed for use in the case of a substitution of partnership interests.
The endorsement does not increase or expand coverage but does extend it
beyond an event that may otherwise terminate the coverage. To utilize
the endorsement you must first thoroughly examine the partnership
agreement to determine that it contains adequate provisions for the
continuation of the partnership in the event of death or withdrawal of a
partner. The charge for this endorsement is a flat $500.00.
·
The
TIRBOP PA ENDORSEMENT 1041
was designed for use in the case of a LLC. The same underwriting
guidelines apply.
The charge for
the endorsement is a flat $500.00.
C. Another
exclusion from coverage involves matters known to the insured but not
disclosed to the insurer. This would include “imputed knowledge”
which may become an issue where a title insurer is asked to insure the
interest of the interest of an incoming partner or shareholder. The
“Non-Imputation” Endorsement was
designed to address this issue.
Business
entities such as corporations and general and limited partnerships often
transfer property indirectly by transferring partial or total ownership
interests in the business. NB
that under this type of transaction there is also the risk that the
transaction may later be determined to be a LBO. Because of this risk
beware if you are asked or required to issue a 1970 (rev. 10/17/84) ALTA
policy form rather than a 1992 form. The 1970 form does not contain a
“creditors’ rights” exclusion.
Thus,
a new partner may be admitted to a partnership by acquiring the
interests of an existing partner, or stock of a corporation may be
transferred from an existing stockholder to a new stockholder. The
business entity may own real estate, and as part of the transfer of
interests in the business entity, the incoming party may wish to be
assured that any existing title insurance will not be forfeited or may
require title insurance as a condition to acquisition. How such a
transfer is underwritten is more particularly addressed in Title
Insurance Underwriting, Principles and Exception Language.
Under
the ALTA Owner’s and Loan Policy, defects, liens, encumbrances,
adverse claims or other matters not known to the title insurer and not
recorded in the public records as of the date of the policy, but known
to the insured and not disclosed in writing to the title insurer prior
to the date the insured (the incoming party) became an insured under the
policy, is excluded from coverage [Ex. 3(d) & C&S 1(c)]. Any new
or reissue insurance written to
cover the business entity or the incoming party would subject the
incoming partner or stockholder to any undisclosed matters known by the
existing partners, stockholders, officers or directors under the legal
theory of imputation of knowledge. Failure to disclose such matters
could void coverage under the standard coverage policy. To avoid this
issue, the incoming party may require the title insurance policy to
issue include a “Non-Imputation Endorsement” which, in effect,
provides that the insurer will not deny coverage to the extent the
incoming party has theoretical (not actual) knowledge of events known by
other parties associated with the business entity.
·
The
TIRBOP PA 1050 was designed
to provide such coverage in partnership situations, while
·
the
TIRBOP PA 1060 was designed
for use for corporate entities.
Underwriting
Guidelines are set forth in Chapter 54 of the original text beginning at
page 22. Also
see ATIC Underwriting Bulletin 90-11 for a detailed review of
the risk analysis.
The filed rate for
coverage is 20% of the applicable premium.
D.
Another
concern of many lawyers is the policy’s definition of insured as found
in the Conditions and
Stipulations of the owner’s policy:
·
the
definition of the “insured” under the terms of the owner’s policy
[see C&S cl. 1]; and
·
the
provisions for the continuation of coverage under the policy [see
C&S cl. 2]
The
“Standard” [as opposed to “Extended”] coverage provided by the
ALTA title insurance policy is further limited by the preprinted section
entitled Conditions and
Stipulations [C&S]. Continuation of coverage after conveyance of
title is addressed under C&S clause 2. It is the intention of this
clause to limit coverage to the
named insured. However, as Bob Ellis comments in The Title
Insurance Law Handbook, the concept embodied in C&S clause 2 of
limiting coverage to the named insured, and thus excluding unnamed
grantees, assignees, etc., has been upheld by the courts in relatively
few cases [see Ellis, supra.,
page 404, Comment ¶ 2]. Nonetheless, there are policy construction
concerns relating to the “definition of insured” voiced by some
counsel. Some lawyers feel the definition of “insured” is too
limited in the case of:
yle:
normal">see also, letter appearing in PLI Course Handbook N4-4581, November
1993, at page 622). The matter again received attention in the December,
1996 issue of the Title Insurance
Newsletter citing the case
of Covalt v First American Title Insurance Co., 1997 WL 4273 (10th
Cir.) – unpublished opinion [see
also ALTA Title Counsel Meeting Agenda, May, 1997, exhibit 14]. The
most noteworthy legal articles on this issue may be found listed on the
TLA website located at www.titlelawannotated®.com/endors.html .ALTA has not adopted
an endorsement coverage addressing this issue, although many of its
corporate underwriting members have adopted their own individual
endorsements forms recognizing such transfers provided the coverage is
requested and the premium paid.
·
The
TIRBO PA Endorsement 1090 was
designed to provide for the continuation of coverage in those cases
where an existing insured transfers the insured property to the trustees
of an inter vivos trust, subject to the further provisions and
conditions as therein set forth. This endorsement expands the definition
of “insured” in the policy to include trustees of an inter vivos
trust. The charge for this endorsement is a flat rate of $125.00. NB
The endorsement does not change the effective date of the policy. If
that coverage is also sought an additional “Date Down” endorsement
must be requested, issued and paid for after a continuation search and
further examination of the title is performed.
not otherwise covered by
the other endorsements set forth in the manual [emphasis
mine].
Simply stated, you
can’t use the blank endorsement to circumvent a Department of
Insurance approved-filed endorsement form. If you do so you will have
amended coverage “otherwise
covered by other endorsements set forth in this manual” in
violation of the rule.
Sections 6.23 and
2.7, when read together, should make it absolutely clear that any
coverage which alters the filed pre-printed policy and endorsement forms
must be filed as a deviation from the TIRBOP filing and approved by the
Department of Insurance.
ADDITIONAL
ENDORSEMENTS FILED BY SOME UNDERWRITERS AS SPECIAL DEVIATION FILINGS AND
APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE UNDER THE RATE RULES
·
Access
Endorsement [CLTA 103.7]
·
Address
Endorsement [CLTA 116]
·
Assignment
of Mortgage Endorsement [ALTA 10; CLTA 104.12]
·
Assignment
and Date Down Endorsement [ALTA 10.1]
·
Contiguity
or Contiguous Land Endorsement [CLTA 116.4]
·
Date
Down Endorsement
·
Deletion
of General Exceptions Endorsement – This endorsement simplifies the task of removing the pre-printed
general exceptions which have been carried over from the commitment to
Schedule B of the Policy, when the appropriate clearance documentation
has been provided.
·
Land
Abuts Open Street Endorsement
·
Land
Same as Survey Endorsement [CLTA 116.1
·
Leasehold
Loan Conversion Endorsement
·
Leasehold
Owner’s Conversion Endorsement
|